(866)-567-XXXX exchange includes toll-free numbers used around the United States. Calls to these phone numbers may allow customers to reach the party or business without incurring the charges associated with calling standard phone numbers.
The 866-567-XXXX exchange has 11 spam reports
The 866-567-XXXX exchange has 15 comments
People are Saying:
(866) 567-9823 - May 12th, 2026 2:32pm
Reported as spam through quick feedback
(866) 567-5410 - June 20th, 2026 1:35am
Reported as spam through quick feedback
(866) 567-5410 - June 20th, 2026 1:36am
Constant repeat calls
(866) 567-6518 - April 29th, 2024 5:55pm
Ford recall
(866) 567-8641 - January 20th, 2022 9:22pm
After long silence and me saying*****o, they finally said "hello" and that was it. I continued to hear keyboarding in the background and ask who they were but they would not talk. They finally ***g up after about 2 minutes.
(866) 567-8641 - February 11th, 2021 6:57pm
call we're here to help
(866) 567-9692 - October 29th, 2021 11:54pm | Reported from Antioch, CA
WARNING SCAMMER
(866) 567-9692 - October 29th, 2021 11:55pm | Reported from Antioch, CA
WARNING SCAMMER
(866) 567-2295 - November 11th, 2015 11:15pm
This number keeps calling. As soon as I answer they **** up! Call back and mail box is full! I am so sick of this all day and all night sometimes 3 am
(866) 567-2295 - August 15th, 2015 5:32pm
Call everyday , leave no message or answer the call. Call back and there voice mail is full****holes
(866) 567-7290 - March 30th, 2011 4:00am
It's not RBC. It's an external company that claims to be calling on behalf of RBC. Someone from RBC told me that RBC does not outsource so if anyone calls saying that they are calling from another company on behalf of RBC, it's a lie.
(866) 567-8641 - November 7th, 2011 8:14pm
Financial credit network. They are debt collectors and called me to collect a debt I owe to the city I live in for use of an ambulance. Not spam. But ****ty to deal with. No one likes debt collectors
(866) 567-5165 - March 28th, 2011 10:20am
It just played some music and ***g up
(866) 567-8284 - February 11th, 2011 7:36pm
Collections (NCO Financial)
(866) 567-0050 - October 22nd, 2010 4:00am
I wanted to file a class action law suit a***nst these clowns about a month ago. I "owed" $720.00. I spoke with an investigator as well named Ryan Peters. When I spoke with my lawyer, he said that it would be very difficult to file a claim a***nst DAC. This company is located in Khanawake, Quebec - a native reserve - and it seems that they have their own rules and laws there. DAC is owned and operated by a Mohawk gentleman whose name I am still trying to find out. The business is registered as a "Mohawk Sole Proprietorship".My lawyer also looked into past law suits that these guys have been involved in. They have always been the plaintiff - never the defendant - which means they have actually sued people over online gambling issues. I couldnt understand how this was possible since online gaming is illegal in the US. The explanation that was provided to me was this:The UIGEA (Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act) of 2006, claims that the "illegal activity" is the processing of fiscal transaction for any online gaming endeavors. It is not illegal to play poker online. Furthermore, all of the servers for UB.com are located in Kahnawake, QC -- ironically the same place that DAC is located. Because the servers are located in Kahnawake, it can be argued that the debt was incurred in Kahnawake. Online gaming is a legally regulated activity (regulated by the Khanawake Gaming Commission - look at UB.com) and so the debt is 100% legal in Kahnawake. The Quebec courts regulate native affairs in this part of Ca***a, and apply native laws when rendering judgements.There have been 118 actions filed by DAC in Quebec courts a***nst people like us. They have won 57 of their claims, there are 59 claims pending, and they have lost two cases. Staggering stats if you ask me! I tried to find out how many of these claims were actually argued in court vs. how many were won by default because the defendant didn't show up. I can't seem to come accross those stats.Even worse is that a large number of US states accept Quebec judgements and afford reciprocity, which means in most states they can come after you LEGALLY.I would love to go after these a**holes, but I can't figure out any way how - and neither can my attorney. I don't want to get into any trouble. I'm "all-in" for a class action though - so long as we have a claim. Has anyone else spoke to their attorneys? Curious to hear any feedback!Thanks.