
San Mateo
Unknown
94002, 94070
San Carlos-Belmont, CA
37° 30' 24.96", -122° 15' 36.94"
The phone number (650) 585-1589 is located in or around San Carlos-Belmont, CA. This Landline number is registered through Centurylink. There have been 11 searches conducted for this number with 16 user comments as of latest received on April 16th, 2011. This number has a current spam score of 100%. Below you will find additional detailed information:
Want to learn more? Check the (650) 585-1589 FAQ
A phone number may have multiple owners due to a shared/family plan, or a transferral of ownership
Discover key indicators that may help verify a phone number’s legitimacy.
FraudScan Score
-
Fraud Risk
Legitimate User Activity
None
Likely fraudulent, spam, or a new number
Valid Number
No
Prepaid Number
-
Unknown
Active Status
-
Active Status Unknown
Do not Call Status
Not On DNC List
More information for this phone number available
View Full Report
Likely a Safe Caller
User Score
Spam Score
% Spam Risk
Leaked
Not Leaked
Search Volume
High
11 Searches
by our users
Nuisance Call Scan
Low Risk
Complaints
by our users
VoIP Number
-
No
Recent Abuse
No Recent Abuse Found
Risk Level
-
Unknown
This number has been reported as spam times, has been searched 11 times, and has garnered 16 comments by our users. These numbers do not indicate a high potential spam risk, but report if suspected.
Learn more about this phone number and where the caller may be located.
In area code 650, which includes the bustling regions of Santa Clara, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties, the population has seen notable growth, reaching its peak around 2020 with a slight decline thereafter. According to public data sources, this area boasts a vibrant and diverse demographic with a notable economic advantage, showcased by a median household income significantly surpassing the national average and a high labor force participation rate exceeding broader U.S. figures. This indicates strong economic trends and opportunities in the region.
Analysis of FCC complaint data reveals distinctive communication patterns in area code 650. Wireless/mobile calls dominate complaint channels, reflecting prevalent communication trends in this tech-savvy region. A rise in wired complaints since 2020 suggests shifts in communicative preferences. Complaints about prerecorded voice calls peaked in 2018, while abandoned call complaints have decreased since peaking in 2017. The sustained issue of unwanted calls, particularly telemarketing, remains prevalent, with fluctuations in complaints illustrating ongoing challenges despite a reduction in robocall issues after 2014.
AI Disclaimer: This content was generated by artificial intelligence (AI) based on publicly available government data. While we strive for accuracy, the data may be out of date and/or subject to change
Most frequently searched phone numbers in the last 30 days.
People are Saying:
(650) 585-1589 - April 16th, 2011 4:00am
currently this number is in a craiglist free stuff in washington, dc area, giving away a kitchen aid mixer...googled it and found these postings, too good to be true...if it acts like a duck, and sounds like a duck,,,,
(650) 585-1589 - April 16th, 2011 4:00am
currently this number is in a craiglist free stuff, giving away a kitchen aid mixer...googled it and found this postings, too good to be true...if it acts like a duck, and sounds like a duck,,,,
(650) 585-1589 - February 8th, 2010 5:00am
Rec'd a call from this # this morning. Said they wanted to verify information for our existing free listing with them. I asked them for the web address so I could look at our listing. He said I couldn't view the listing because they were updating it(they all say that). I told him to give me the web address so I could check out their company and to call me back. The web address he gave me is www.gale.cengage.com. This website has absolutely nothing even remotely close to what our business is about. We'll see if they call back.
(650) 585-1589 - January 7th, 2010 5:00am
This number has called for several days now, sometimes in rapid succession, always without saying a word, but never disconnects. I called the number and the reconding indicates it's been disconnected, but I don't think so.
(650) 585-1589 - February 4th, 2010 5:00am
Got a call from a fast talking heavy accented woman. Wanted my company info for a ***nding company. Very pushy. I called back after seeing other notes on this. The call can not go through.
(650) 585-1589 - August 6th, 2010 4:00am
got a call, no one on the line, just quiet, ***g up, and then tried to call me back, but didn't answerget lots of telemarketing calls, they all use fake numbers, but not real..
(650) 585-1589 - January 19th, 2010 5:00am
Called me @ 2:59 AM ..... on 1-18-10.I called the number today 1-19-10...says it's no longer in service???
(650) 585-1589 - January 6th, 2010 5:00am
Received call and ****up from this number at 1:15 am (in the morning!)
(650) 585-1589 - January 6th, 2010 5:00am
Same as Jeff above - but called at 2:27AM!
(650) 585-1589 - February 16th, 2010 5:00am
Woman with accent called, terrible connection...I just ***g up
(650) 585-1589 - January 6th, 2010 5:00am
Same as Dan
(650) 585-1589 - October 8th, 2009 4:00am
When this number called and had an opprotunity to leave a message, they did not and held the line for 45 seconds and I could hear them in the background on the recording. (Couldn't make anything out) We had no prior business relationship with this phone number at this place of business.
(650) 585-1589 - June 17th, 2009 4:00am
Received a call from Lexus Nexus, but didn't get her name.I would like to verify if this was really a business call.
(650) 585-1589 - May 20th, 2009 4:00am
Phishing for information. Transfered caller and they would not leave a message.
(650) 585-1589 - June 3rd, 2008 4:00am
This**** keeps calling and saying that he needs information about the company for updating purposes. He claims he has never called and wants to find out out address. Hes a *****!
(650) 585-1589 - January 29th, 2008 5:00am
Called business number and said they were from Billboard magazine and wanted to verify information. Said his name was Tom Black. Asked him to remove info and said he would.